by William Gibson
ISBN: 0006480411
I read this book as it was recommended to me by a friend as a classic. I’m sure it was revolutionary in its time, but I didn't enjoy it. I found it very difficult to follow. It was suggested to me that I should sit down and try and read it all in a couple of sittings. It would probably have made more sense if I had and I may try and do that in the future.
I just didn’t warm to the main character, Case. However I don’t think you’re meant to. All the drugs references did nothing for me either. Maybe I didn’t play hard enough in my youth. I also think software and virtual reality has come on too far for what was in the book to seem magical and new.
Unless I re-read Neuromancer and enjoy it, I won’t be reading any more William Gibson.
ISBN: 0006480411
I read this book as it was recommended to me by a friend as a classic. I’m sure it was revolutionary in its time, but I didn't enjoy it. I found it very difficult to follow. It was suggested to me that I should sit down and try and read it all in a couple of sittings. It would probably have made more sense if I had and I may try and do that in the future.
I just didn’t warm to the main character, Case. However I don’t think you’re meant to. All the drugs references did nothing for me either. Maybe I didn’t play hard enough in my youth. I also think software and virtual reality has come on too far for what was in the book to seem magical and new.
Unless I re-read Neuromancer and enjoy it, I won’t be reading any more William Gibson.
Boo hisss, well If you did not get on with this novel then all his other works are written in the same manner. I think part of the problem is a lot of time has passed maybe. I know what you mean about software and virtual reality but was written when these things were being invented so the terminology and ideas are off.
ReplyDeleteI do remember that it took me several readings to get the most out of the novel, but thats the way gibson writes.
I think an another example here could be Johnny Mnemonic http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113481/, the short story is good. The implementation in film is bad or at least a guilty pleasure. So interpretation is really king.
I read Neuromancer last year, and thoroughly enjoyed it; I'm looking forward to reading his other books when I get a chance.
ReplyDeleteI don't think you have to have "played hard" to empathise with Case. I felt like I understood where he was coming from, and wanted him to be OK.
I actually found that since I read it, a lot of references to things in the computer/hacker/scifi world made a bit more sense --- this book is where many of the ideas and terminology came from.
I recommend you take another look.