Skip to main content

Mobile Market Share

Image
By

I’ve just started reading Little Miss Geek: Bridging the Gap Between Girls and Technology by Belinda Parmar. One of the early chapters is entitled Five Reasons Why A Technology CEO Should care. One of the reasons is that Women Are Untapped Consumers In The Market. The basic argument is that if you can sell more products by targeting different groups of people in the market, why wouldn’t you? Businesses are there to make money and many of them, especially tech manufacturing businesses do that by selling more products. The more people you appeal to, the more products you sell, the more money you make. It’s common sense and not rocket science. I don’t see how anyone can argue with it.

However, this blog post isn’t about women in technology it’s about attitudes in mobile development. Reading this section of Little Miss Geek reminded me of a common argument  I have with many mobile developers. I’m always surprised, no shocked when a company or individual is only developing an application for iPhone or just for Android. Or they only want to learn about native iPhone development or are only interested in Android development because Apple is so restrictive. I could go on, but I won’t.

Whatever the actual share of the market is, iPhones and Android based phones both have a large part of it. It’s no argument to only target Android because they have a bigger share than the iPhone. What about all those iPhone users you’re not targeting.  Would you prefer to have 100% of the Android market and 0% of the iPhone market or 100% of both? Targeting only a single platform is not commercial suicide, but it does significantly reduce your potential consumers and therefore your profits, and profit is what it’s all about, right?

When I was a child I stopped programming my BBC because no one would ever use the software I wrote. I didn’t write any software for quite a while until we got a PC. Then I wrote a lot of C and later, professionally huge amounts of C++. I wrote a C++ based testing framework and strived to make it compile on as many platforms as possible as i wanted lots of people to use it. C++ is a pernickety language and people use it on all sorts of strange platforms with any number of varying compilers. If my framework wouldn’t compile with their compiler on their platform they wouldn’t (in fact couldn't) use it and I would lose a potential user. The different mobile platforms are just as pernickety as C++. If you don’t have something that works on all of them you lose potential users and revenue.

I’m not going to discuss cross platform mobile development versus native mobile development, that’s a whole other blog post and I am hoping that Boydlee Pollentine will put that one to bed at MobDevCon next week. My point is that if you target men, but not women or iPhones but not Android phones you restrict your potential sales, revenue and profit. And we all want more profit, right?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Write Your Own Load Balancer: A worked Example

By
I was out walking with a techie friend of mine I’d not seen for a while and he asked me if I’d written anything recently. I hadn’t, other than an article on data sharing a few months before and I realised I was missing it. Well, not the writing itself, but the end result. In the last few weeks, another friend of mine, John Cricket , has been setting weekly code challenges via linkedin and his new website, https://codingchallenges.fyi/ . They were all quite interesting, but one in particular on writing load balancers appealed, so I thought I’d kill two birds with one stone and write up a worked example. You’ll find my worked example below. The challenge itself is italics and voice is that of John Crickets. The Coding Challenge https://codingchallenges.fyi/challenges/challenge-load-balancer/ Write Your Own Load Balancer This challenge is to build your own application layer load balancer. A load balancer sits in front of a group of servers and routes client requests across all of the serv...
Post a Comment
Read more

Remember to Delegate: The Triangle of Trust

By
So you think you can lead a team? I’ve been talking and writing a lot about leading a software engineering team in 2025. I started thinking about it more deeply the year before when I decided to give a colleague, who was moving into team leading, some advice: 'Doing the work' isn't the only way to add value Remember to delegate Pick your battles Talk to your team every day Out of this came a talk, “So you think you can lead a team?” which I gave at work, at meetups and at conferences in various different formats during the first quarter of 2025. Here I am looking at Remember to Delegate and an idea which came out of discussion around the talk, The Triangle of Trust, in more detail. Delegate Delegation is a crucial skill for any team lead, yet it is often one of the most challenging aspects of leadership to master. Many leaders, particularly those who have risen through the ranks as individual contributors, struggle to let go of tasks, fearing a loss of control or a dip in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7

By
I recently upgraded from Tomcat 6 to Tomcat 7 and all of my Ant deployment scripts stopped working. I eventually worked out why and made the necessary changes, but there doesn’t seem to be a complete description of how to use Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7 on the web so I thought I'd write one. To start with, make sure Tomcat manager is configured for use by Catalina-Ant. Make sure that manager-script is included in the roles for one of the users in TOMCAT_HOME/conf/tomcat-users.xml . For example: <tomcat-users> <user name="admin" password="s3cr£t" roles="manager-gui, manager-script "/> </tomcat-users> Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 6 was encapsulated within a single JAR file. Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7 requires four JAR files. One from TOMCAT_HOME/bin : tomcat-juli.jar and three from TOMCAT_HOME/lib: catalina-ant.jar tomcat-coyote.jar tomcat-util.jar There are at least three ways of making the JARs available to Ant: Copy the JARs into th...
22 comments
Read more