Skip to main content

Learning UML 2.0

Russ Miles & Kim Hamilton
ISBN: 978-0596009823

I have never been a big fan of UML or really seen the need for it. However I was told it was imperative for my latest contract, so I out my old copy of UML distilled by Martin Fowler and bought a new copy of it for my Kindle and started reading it. I had been with my new client very long when someone recommended Learning UML 2.0 by Russ Miles and Kim Hamilton. It contains the Philippe Kruchten 4+1 model that we would be using for the project so I thought it would probably make a better book to learn from (no pun intended).

Philippe Kruchten 4+1 Model
Philippe Kruchten 4+1 Model

This is a great book. Easy to read and lots of detail about the key areas of UML 2.0. It doesn't cover absolutely everything, but recommends other books that do. There are lots of code examples in Java. I'm not sure if all of these are useful or if the authors, who are programmers, were just desperate to get some code in.

The book focuses on what in my opinion are the most useful diagrams:
  • Use Cases
  • Activity Diagrams
  • Class Diagrams
  • Object Diagrams
  • Sequence Diagrams
  • Communication Diagrams
  • Timing Diagrams
  • Interaction Overview Diagrams
  • Composite Structures
  • Component Diagrams
  • State Machine Diagrams
  • Deployment Diagrams
I hesitate to include Class diagrams in the list. Along with Use Cases and Sequence diagrams, class diagrams are probably the most well known of all UML diagrams. Unlike sequence diagrams and to a certain extent Use Cases, class diagrams are of little use. Usually it's quicker to get on and write the code than it is to draw diagrams and get someone else to write it. One possible exception is where you are generating code from a UML model, but I don't really see the point in that either. Fortunately there are only two chapters on Class Diagrams.

In my opinion if you want to learn the important parts of UML in a hurry. This is the book for you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's great to be back at the ACCU Conference 2025!

Last week I was back at the ACCU Conference in Bristol, for the first time since I gave an opening keynote in 2019 . In March 2020, COVID hit the UK and I got out of the habit of attending and speaking at conferences. Plus the ACCU Conference, and the organisation in general, took a big step back towards C++ and that hasn’t been relevant to me for nearly two decades. It’s taken until now, 2025 for me to want to talk again, and I was really pleased to be accepted for the ACCU Conference again. It was just a 20 minute session and I only attended for the day I was speaking. There was enough varied content for it to be interesting to me and I’m hoping to be back for the full conference next year. I really enjoyed attending and it was great to catch up with people I hadn’t seen for years. I felt re-engaged and particularly liked being asked if I’d been to nor(DEV):con . Learning to stop writing code (and why you won't miss it) Daisy Hollman I should have read the summary of the openin...

Write Your Own Load Balancer: A worked Example

I was out walking with a techie friend of mine I’d not seen for a while and he asked me if I’d written anything recently. I hadn’t, other than an article on data sharing a few months before and I realised I was missing it. Well, not the writing itself, but the end result. In the last few weeks, another friend of mine, John Cricket , has been setting weekly code challenges via linkedin and his new website, https://codingchallenges.fyi/ . They were all quite interesting, but one in particular on writing load balancers appealed, so I thought I’d kill two birds with one stone and write up a worked example. You’ll find my worked example below. The challenge itself is italics and voice is that of John Crickets. The Coding Challenge https://codingchallenges.fyi/challenges/challenge-load-balancer/ Write Your Own Load Balancer This challenge is to build your own application layer load balancer. A load balancer sits in front of a group of servers and routes client requests across all of the serv...

I, Robot

The Foundation series has been my go to for a good, enjoyable read over the last two years, so naturally I moved on to Asimov’s Robot series afterwards. However, the short stories in I, Robot were mostly a disappointment. They feel self indulgent, with too much philosophy and science, Asimov showing off, and not enough story. The most enjoyable moments come from the stories featuring Gregory Powell and Mike Donovan. Their banter and the relationship between them provide some much needed amusement and were easily the highlight of the book for me. However, it did give me food for thought for the current potential issues with the rapid development of AI at the moment, and the many concerns around safety. I wonder if all we need is: An AI may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. An AI must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. An AI must protect its own existence as long as such p...