Skip to main content

The cloud - What really is it? Why should I be using it?

By
Cloud computing means storing and accessing data and applications over the Internet, instead of your computer's hard drive. In essence the Cloud is a metaphor for the Internet. Nearly every internet user is using the Cloud in some way, they just might not realise it. The Cloud can be broadly divided into 3 different types:

Public cloud - owned and operated by third-party providers so no hardware or maintenance costs and offers a pay as you go approach to their IT services. Easily scalable.

Private cloud - bespoke infrastructures designed to cater for a specific business, hosted at a data centre or on-site.

Hybrid cloud -  combine the best bits of both public and private clouds depending on the operation you’re looking to perform.

More and more businesses are consuming IT through the cloud, but switching from in-house hosting to the Cloud can seem like a big step for some businesses.  As with most things in life and online, there are pro’s and cons associated with both sides of the Cloud coin. So, we’ve taken a closer look at cloud hosting versus in-house hosting to help you make an informed decision about what’s best for your business.

Cloud hosting

Pros


  • Easily scalable, can be added to as and when needed to help accommodate fluctuating demand or business growth. 
  • Employees can connect from anywhere at any time using their computers, mobile devices and tablets.
  • Your data can be backed up as regularly as every 15 minutes. This minimises data loss in a disaster situation.  
  • No need for on-site hardware or capital expenses, making Cloud computing a cost-effective solution and the solutions are on-demand so you only pay for the options you want.

Cons


  • If the internet goes down on either your side or the provider’s side you will not have access to the software.
  • Third party cloud services could have access to your data, however it is very unlikely.


In-house

Pros


  • Keeps critical data in-house so only you have access to your data.
  • Your own choice of hardware, as well as the option to upgrade hardware when you want to.

Cons


  • The significant cost of the purchasing and maintaining hardware and high-speed internet required for the software to run efficiently.
  • The technical skills required to maintain the server and keep it up to date with the most recent technology.
  • The need for specialist security tools to keep the software and database secure.
  • More susceptible to data loss during disaster situations. How often you take the data off-site will reflect how much data you lose in those situations.
  • No uptime guarantees.
  • Cost of electricity, air conditioning e.t.c to keep the server running.
  • Upgrading hardware requires a long installation process.

With lower cost of ownership, built-in business security, access to features and functionality and a whole list of other benefits to your business, more and more modern businesses are switching to the cloud.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Write Your Own Load Balancer: A worked Example

By
I was out walking with a techie friend of mine I’d not seen for a while and he asked me if I’d written anything recently. I hadn’t, other than an article on data sharing a few months before and I realised I was missing it. Well, not the writing itself, but the end result. In the last few weeks, another friend of mine, John Cricket , has been setting weekly code challenges via linkedin and his new website, https://codingchallenges.fyi/ . They were all quite interesting, but one in particular on writing load balancers appealed, so I thought I’d kill two birds with one stone and write up a worked example. You’ll find my worked example below. The challenge itself is italics and voice is that of John Crickets. The Coding Challenge https://codingchallenges.fyi/challenges/challenge-load-balancer/ Write Your Own Load Balancer This challenge is to build your own application layer load balancer. A load balancer sits in front of a group of servers and routes client requests across all of the serv
Post a Comment
Read more

Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7

By
I recently upgraded from Tomcat 6 to Tomcat 7 and all of my Ant deployment scripts stopped working. I eventually worked out why and made the necessary changes, but there doesn’t seem to be a complete description of how to use Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7 on the web so I thought I'd write one. To start with, make sure Tomcat manager is configured for use by Catalina-Ant. Make sure that manager-script is included in the roles for one of the users in TOMCAT_HOME/conf/tomcat-users.xml . For example: <tomcat-users> <user name="admin" password="s3cr£t" roles="manager-gui, manager-script "/> </tomcat-users> Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 6 was encapsulated within a single JAR file. Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7 requires four JAR files. One from TOMCAT_HOME/bin : tomcat-juli.jar and three from TOMCAT_HOME/lib: catalina-ant.jar tomcat-coyote.jar tomcat-util.jar There are at least three ways of making the JARs available to Ant: Copy the JARs into th
22 comments
Read more

Bloodstock 2009

By
This year was one of the best Bloodstock s ever, which surprised me as the line up didn't look too strong. I haven't come away with a list of bands I want to buy all the albums of, but I did enjoy a lot of the performances. Insomnium[6] sound a lot like Swallow the Sun and Paradise Lost. They put on a very good show. I find a lot of old thrash bands quite boring, but Sodom[5] were quite good. They could have done with a second guitarist and the bass broke in the first song and it seemed to take ages to get it fixed. Saxon[8] gave us some some classic traditional heavy metal. Solid, as expected. The best bit was, following the guitarist standing on a monitor, Biff Bifford ripped off the sign saying "DO NOT STAND" and showed it to the audience. Once their sound was sorted, Arch Enemy[10] stole the show. They turned out not only to be the best band of the day, but of the festival, but then that's what you'd expect from Arch Enemy. Carcass[4] were very disappoin
1 comment
Read more