Skip to main content

The Great Dune Trilogy: A Review

The Great Dune Trilogy
Frank Herbert
ISBN-13: 0575070706

I remember distinctly reading Dune in 1992 after seeing the 1980s film. In fact I can still picture myself lying on a bed in a holiday cottage in a small French village near Carcassonne reading the book. I went on to read Dune Messiah, but couldn’t get into Children of Dune. I tried it again several years later, but still couldn’t get into it. Dune has been on my list to reread for a while. When searching for Dune in the Amazon Kindle store the trilogy came up as one book, so I decided to read all three straight through and I’m glad I did!

There’s no getting away from the fact that Dune is a great story. I discovered recently that it’s two stories glued together and it shows. The first half of the book has lots of details and then there appears to be a large gap in the story, which at least one of the films attempted to fill, and then you get the end of the story. I don’t really like the way Frank Herbert explains what’s going to happen at the beginning and then that’s what happens, with a small twist at the end. I’d rather be kept in suspense.

Dune Messiah is a great little story, but it mostly leaves science fiction behind in favour of feudalism and politics. This is also where I think Herbert starts getting indulgent. Most of us love well developed characters, but I found myself in their heads far too much. The twelve year gap in the story between Dune and Dune Messiah where a whole Jihad rages across the galaxy isn’t done justice.

I enjoyed, mostly, Children of Dune too, but it was very much more of the same. I didn’t see the end coming, which was a good surprise, but I don’t think I liked it.

It will be interesting to see how God Emperor of Dune shapes up, especially as it’s set several thousand years in the future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Write Your Own Load Balancer: A worked Example

I was out walking with a techie friend of mine I’d not seen for a while and he asked me if I’d written anything recently. I hadn’t, other than an article on data sharing a few months before and I realised I was missing it. Well, not the writing itself, but the end result. In the last few weeks, another friend of mine, John Cricket , has been setting weekly code challenges via linkedin and his new website, https://codingchallenges.fyi/ . They were all quite interesting, but one in particular on writing load balancers appealed, so I thought I’d kill two birds with one stone and write up a worked example. You’ll find my worked example below. The challenge itself is italics and voice is that of John Crickets. The Coding Challenge https://codingchallenges.fyi/challenges/challenge-load-balancer/ Write Your Own Load Balancer This challenge is to build your own application layer load balancer. A load balancer sits in front of a group of servers and routes client requests across all of the serv

Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7

I recently upgraded from Tomcat 6 to Tomcat 7 and all of my Ant deployment scripts stopped working. I eventually worked out why and made the necessary changes, but there doesn’t seem to be a complete description of how to use Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7 on the web so I thought I'd write one. To start with, make sure Tomcat manager is configured for use by Catalina-Ant. Make sure that manager-script is included in the roles for one of the users in TOMCAT_HOME/conf/tomcat-users.xml . For example: <tomcat-users> <user name="admin" password="s3cr£t" roles="manager-gui, manager-script "/> </tomcat-users> Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 6 was encapsulated within a single JAR file. Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7 requires four JAR files. One from TOMCAT_HOME/bin : tomcat-juli.jar and three from TOMCAT_HOME/lib: catalina-ant.jar tomcat-coyote.jar tomcat-util.jar There are at least three ways of making the JARs available to Ant: Copy the JARs into th

Bloodstock 2009

This year was one of the best Bloodstock s ever, which surprised me as the line up didn't look too strong. I haven't come away with a list of bands I want to buy all the albums of, but I did enjoy a lot of the performances. Insomnium[6] sound a lot like Swallow the Sun and Paradise Lost. They put on a very good show. I find a lot of old thrash bands quite boring, but Sodom[5] were quite good. They could have done with a second guitarist and the bass broke in the first song and it seemed to take ages to get it fixed. Saxon[8] gave us some some classic traditional heavy metal. Solid, as expected. The best bit was, following the guitarist standing on a monitor, Biff Bifford ripped off the sign saying "DO NOT STAND" and showed it to the audience. Once their sound was sorted, Arch Enemy[10] stole the show. They turned out not only to be the best band of the day, but of the festival, but then that's what you'd expect from Arch Enemy. Carcass[4] were very disappoin