Skip to main content

Bloodstock 2009

This year was one of the best Bloodstocks ever, which surprised me as the line up didn't look too strong. I haven't come away with a list of bands I want to buy all the albums of, but I did enjoy a lot of the performances.

Insomnium[6] sound a lot like Swallow the Sun and Paradise Lost. They put on a very good show. I find a lot of old thrash bands quite boring, but Sodom[5] were quite good. They could have done with a second guitarist and the bass broke in the first song and it seemed to take ages to get it fixed. Saxon[8] gave us some some classic traditional heavy metal. Solid, as expected. The best bit was, following the guitarist standing on a monitor, Biff Bifford ripped off the sign saying "DO NOT STAND" and showed it to the audience. Once their sound was sorted, Arch Enemy[10] stole the show. They turned out not only to be the best band of the day, but of the festival, but then that's what you'd expect from Arch Enemy. Carcass[4] were very disappointing. They played some stuff from Heartwork, but none of their set had the best sound. Arch Enemy should have been on last.

Just like all the other folk/battle metal bands Battlelore[3] were, bland and rubbish which was not helped by the poor PA setup. Wolf[7] were much better than last time I saw them at Bloodstock (when they lost sound part way into their set). Still the same old Slayer/Metallica/Maiden wannabes though. With the Haunted [1] I just didn't see the point. To stoner like for me maybe. I haven't seen or kept up with Entombed[7] for ten years or more. They're great. Especially A Damn Deal Done. Lots of fun. Candlemass[2] seemed to play quite well, but are just not my sort of thing. I was hoping Enslaved[5] would be great from the off, but all they really managed was ok. Good fusion of black and death metal, nothing new. Kreator[8] are like Deicide and Like Slayer, only better. Loved it. Band of the day. All I can say about Apocolytica[1] is nice idea, but the only thing that makes this metal is the drummer. I'm sure some love it, but I don't. I wanted not to like Blind Guardian[5] as their Twyst in the Myth album is rubbish, but they weren't too bad. What can I say about Cradle of Filth[4]? They were half an hour late to the stage. They were really loose, but better than the last time I saw them. Then they called it off after Paul A got hit on the back by a gob stopper fired from a catapult bought on stage. Not very metal, especially when Dani Filth had been goading the crowd to throw full drinks rather than empty ones. To be honest if the Bloodstock organisers are going to book a band like Cradle of Filth to festival many of us believe represents true metal, what do they expect? I Hope Cradle of Filth never darken Bloodstock's door again.

Beholder[6] gave us some straight up metal and despite the singers verbal diarrhea Surprisingly good. For Agonyst[9] I was in a tent full of familiar faces from the Marquee in Norwich, including Louis Coates on the stage. Totally superb progressive death metal with a great sense of humour. Girlschool [4] were disappointing, but then they probably weren't good musicians 30 years ago either. Equilibrium[8] are a great band! They want to be death, folk, black and battle metal, but I like it! Anathema[9]: Wow! Another band I haven't kept up with for 10 years. Opened with my favourite song and did a stonking set of old stuff. With Martin Powel (ex My Dying Bride, ex Cradle of Filth) and one of my favourite and best drummers in the work, Nick Barker (ex Cradle of Filth, ex Dimmu Borgir) on drums and finishing with an iron maiden cover of Phantom of the Opera, Anathema are the second band of the festival. Wish I'd kept up with them over the years now. Turisas [6] weren't quite as good as expected. There was a bit more music and less larking about this time though. Good entertainment none the less. Moonspell[8] were very good as expected. Just wish I knew more of their stuff better. Amon Amarth[9]: Death Metal! Wow! As good as expected. Loved it. I was a Viking for an hour. Satyricon were very enjoyable to watch, but they've only really got one sound, not that it's a bad one. I enjoyed them more at the last Download. The singer is a great entertainer. Europe [5] didn't have a good sound, at least where we were standing. The bass swamped everything. I did wonder if maybe they'd turned it all up to try and feel heavier to a metal audience. Joey Tempest always proclaims John Norum as a guitar god and he just isn't that good. I was horribly disappointed as prior to today I rated them as the second best live show I'd ever seen (after Wasp performing the Crimson Idol and closely followed by Roger Waters, Pink Floyd, The Mission in 1995 and Fish performing all of Misplaced Childhood). I'm hoping bloodstock get a decent headliner next year after three duff ones this year.

There's rumours of Threshold playing again next year. I suspect the best they can hope for is a special guests slot, but even that is unlikely. If they play it'll just be superb. The organisers need to look at the tshirts people are wearing. I'd love to see Lamb of God, Deicide, Behemoth, Vader, Nile, Hypocrisy. Cradle of Filth and Europe just aren't what Bloodstock is about.

Comments

  1. Bloodstock probably wasn't the best place to see Apocalyptica for a start, because they immediately come across as a novelty act. Also if everyone else was having sound problems, I bet they probably were too.

    I saw them in Birmingham a couple of years ago, and they were terrific. Those cellos can get very loud and very heavy, as on their version of Refuse/Resist or Harmageddon. They are, however, aware of the silliness of their proposition, and also do a blazingly fast version of In the Hall of the Mountain King, and turned Enter Sandman into a big audience singalong. Fab.

    Given them another try another time.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Write Your Own Load Balancer: A worked Example

I was out walking with a techie friend of mine I’d not seen for a while and he asked me if I’d written anything recently. I hadn’t, other than an article on data sharing a few months before and I realised I was missing it. Well, not the writing itself, but the end result. In the last few weeks, another friend of mine, John Cricket , has been setting weekly code challenges via linkedin and his new website, https://codingchallenges.fyi/ . They were all quite interesting, but one in particular on writing load balancers appealed, so I thought I’d kill two birds with one stone and write up a worked example. You’ll find my worked example below. The challenge itself is italics and voice is that of John Crickets. The Coding Challenge https://codingchallenges.fyi/challenges/challenge-load-balancer/ Write Your Own Load Balancer This challenge is to build your own application layer load balancer. A load balancer sits in front of a group of servers and routes client requests across all of the serv

Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7

I recently upgraded from Tomcat 6 to Tomcat 7 and all of my Ant deployment scripts stopped working. I eventually worked out why and made the necessary changes, but there doesn’t seem to be a complete description of how to use Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7 on the web so I thought I'd write one. To start with, make sure Tomcat manager is configured for use by Catalina-Ant. Make sure that manager-script is included in the roles for one of the users in TOMCAT_HOME/conf/tomcat-users.xml . For example: <tomcat-users> <user name="admin" password="s3cr£t" roles="manager-gui, manager-script "/> </tomcat-users> Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 6 was encapsulated within a single JAR file. Catalina-Ant for Tomcat 7 requires four JAR files. One from TOMCAT_HOME/bin : tomcat-juli.jar and three from TOMCAT_HOME/lib: catalina-ant.jar tomcat-coyote.jar tomcat-util.jar There are at least three ways of making the JARs available to Ant: Copy the JARs into th